FTCE Exceptional Student Education (ESE) K-12 Practice Test

In Smith v. Robinson (1984), the primary issue addressed was the reimbursement of attorney's fees for parents who sought to challenge the educational placement or services provided to their child with a disability under the Education for All Handicapped Children Act (EAHCA), which is now known as the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The case highlighted the financial burdens that parents faced when advocating for appropriate educational services for their children. The court ruled that parents who prevail in litigation regarding their child’s educational needs should be entitled to reimbursement for their attorney's fees, establishing a precedent that supports the rights of families in special education disputes. This ruling underscores the importance of ensuring that parents have the necessary resources to effectively advocate for their children's educational rights, thereby reinforcing the overall intent of the legislation to ensure equal access to education for students with disabilities.